17 September 2024
The fact that immigrants learned the language over three generations is irrelevant now. A century ago, first-generation immigrants didn't acquire much English and worked in menial professions. Their children learned English, finished high school, and found white-collar careers. Their descendants learned the language, attended college, and became physicians and attorneys.
Speaking, reading, and writing English offer newcomers the most significant opportunity to pursue school and employment prospects. Legal immigrants must pass an English proficiency exam to be eligible for citizenship.
The government provides services in a multitude of languages. This lessens the incentive for immigrants to learn English to their disadvantage.
The motivation to learn a language when moving to another country is strong and needs no justification. Before you start learning a new language, you should check your English level, for example, https://livexp.com/skills/english/language-test. Then, you can choose a tutor according to the criteria of education, working hours, and cost of lessons.
No one is illegal — the language we use for immigration
People seeking food, shelter, and safety are often called "natural disasters" in political debate and media coverage. Dehumanising metaphors used to describe humans, such as "flood" and "surge," falsely portray migrants as hazardous, unpredictable, and destructive.
As countries revise their policy toward asylum seekers, the media must utilise unbiased, truthful language.
Numerous academics have shown that adopting negative metaphors to characterise immigrants impacts public perception and deprives immigrants of their uniqueness, thus making them seem less worthy of support and compassion. A study demonstrated that using the term "flood" to describe immigrant children dehumanises them and justifies brutal behaviour. As a result, these youngsters became a chaotic, overpowering, and unmanageable force that needed to be stopped.